保持愿景！（生态定居地与祖传家园区别)

未分类

前言

作者讲了生态定居地与阿夏的祖传家园的区别。
中文为机器翻译，略作修改。

原文链接

Keep hold of the vision!
https://vmegre.com/en/events/39418/

英文原文

Keep hold of the vision! 13.09.2018 11:52:56

I believe it is necessary to discuss whether settlements consisting of kin domains (family homesteads) can be termed "eco-settlements"? We return to this question because to continue the continuous actions of certain forces resolve at all costs to rename Kin Domain Settlements "eco-settlements". This occurs partly from misunderstandings about the people who initiate Kin Domain (Family Homestead) settlements, and a lack of awareness that the collocation "Kin Domain settlement" (or "Family Homestead settlement") refers to something else completely, with an independent, self-contained meaning. I use the phrase 'certain forces', but I will also specify what these forces are when it is appropriate. It is also important to understand why it is necessary to do so. Kin Domain settlements and eco-settlements are two different things which have nothing in common with one another.

Let us start by examining the features of what is known as an "eco-settlement". We can do this by looking at how Russian and English language websites describe eco-settlements. Take this excerpt, for example: "It is believed that eco-settlements were started by hippies in the early 60s. They moved away from populated areas, meditated, sang songs and planted carrots"¹. Therefore, by calling eco-settlements 'Kin Domain (Family Homestead) settlements', we are agreeing that they have their roots in the 60s hippy movement.

Let us look further.

Here's another internet article which cites the 10 most influential eco-settlements in the world. At number one is Auroville². I discuss this eco-settlement n my fifth book, "Who are We?" in the chapter entitled "The Auroville Dream". I will recap the main points here.

The founder of the eco-settlement, Miira Alfassa (commonly known as "The Mother"), was alloted land and money for the project by the Indian Government (although members of the eco-settlement were not given land or property.) The land was alloted in 1968 with the intention of amassing up to 50 thousand settlers, however, at the time of writing the population of the settlement is about 2000. As we can see, the eco-settlement never successfully developed, despite the many advertisements and speeches about the spirituality of the place. Because Auroville failed to develop effectively, it failed to amass followers. By contrast, in 2001 over 400 settlements approaching 37,000 family residents came into being in Russia. See the difference? And yet the leader of Auroville was handed free money and land (as were, incidentally, several other so-called eco-settlements). What is more, Auroville had been established for considerably longer than the Russian settlements. In other words, the eco-settlement movements of the world do not develop. If we start calling the founders of Kin Domain settlements in Russia and other countries founders of eco-settlements, we can imagine getting reports of the same unstable developments in these settlements as is experienced by eco-settlements around the globe. And, as you can probably imagine, this initiative didn't come from Russia, but the west. You can read more on the topic in a pretty good article called "What to initiate - a Kin Domain (Family Homestead) Settlement or an Eco-settlement?"³.

Many readers of the "Ringing Cedars" book series understand the difference between the phenomenon known as an eco-settlement and that which is depicted by the phrase "Kin Domain (Family Homestead) settlement". Sadly, not everyone does. Let's imagine a situation: What happens when someone who hasn't read Megre's books says something like, "Around 400 eco-settlements have already been established in Russia!" That person then searches the word 'eco-settlement' on the internet and finds the top-10, with Auroville in first place. And if she wants to know more about the eco-settlement movement, where does she turn? Exactly. She goes to Auroville. And so, if we call our Kin Domain setllements 'eco-settlements', we'll have to start emulating the Auroville experience, seeing as it's the number one eco-settlement in the world.

Now let us return to the framework of the Kin Domain settlement as described by Anastasia. At the heart of it is the word "rodovoe" ("kin" or "patrimonial") itself, with the root: rod

Rod (species/ race/ family).

Rodina (fatherland/motherland)

Rodoslovnaya (ancestry/ family tree)

Rodnoe (home/ native).

It was precisely these connotations that inspired people to initiate Kin Domain settlements. It gave them the strength to imagine a beautiful future and bring it to life. It depicts an energy that raises us up on the spiritual plane. Man depends on that energy as a fundamental part of his being. Anyone is free to deny themselves this vision. However, if they do this, the energy will quietly depart from their lives. When a person finds herself without a spiritual core, she will fall apart, unless the vision for the future that she rejected is exchanged for another that is equal in strength. However, we don't witness this downfall in our Kin Domain settlements. Perhaps we are more aware of that energy that raised us up, and continues to raise us spiritually?

So, how to respond to the question "Are you an eco-settlement?" Let's resolve this together. I think you can say something like this: "We attentively and thoughtfully take care of the nature around us and, furthermore, we strive to improve the environment. However, we are not an eco-settlement, but a settlement that consists of family homesteads."

On the official Kin Domain settlement sites, it doesn't say anything about eco-settlements but, nevertheless, this term is used all over the internet to describe even my Kin Domain settlements. There's even a film with that title that thanks Anastasia and I in the credits: "warm thanks to Anastasia and Vladimir Megrе”.

In recent times, official sites have started to recognise the strength in the Russian settlement movement. For example, in one program about the development of the far East which was endorsed by the president of the Russian Federation, there is a section on 'Kin Domain (Family Homestead) settlements"⁴.

The "People's Front" launched a contest for the best ivision for the future of Russia.⁵ People talked about Kin Domain settlements in some of the clips⁶ filmed for the contest. Teachers and settlement founders held a conference at MSU (Moscow State University) titled: "International Scientific and Practical Conference on the 'Role and Conditions for the Development of "Kin Domain Settlements'".

We must understand and protect our vision. Not merely protect but understand its foundations!

Respectfully,
Vladimir Megre

View Kin Domain Settlements list https://vmegre.com/en/kin-domain/

中文

我认为有必要讨论由祖传家园（家庭所属）组成的定居点是否可以被称为“生态定居点”？我们回到这个问题是因为继续某些部队的持续行动，不惜一切代价重新确定Kin Domain Settlements“生态解决方案”。这部分是由于对启动Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）定居点的人的误解，以及缺乏认识到“Kin Domain定居点”（或“家庭宅基地定居点”）完全引用其他东西，独立自我的意识含有意义。我使用了“某些力量”这个短语，但我也会在适当时指定这些力量。理解为什么有必要这样做也很重要。

让我们首先考察一下所谓的“生态解决方案”的特征。我们可以通过查看俄语和英语网站如何描述生态定居点来实现这一目标。以此为例摘录，例如：“人们相信生态定居点是在60年代初期由嬉皮士开始的。他们远离人口稠密地区，冥想，唱歌和种植胡萝卜”¹。因此，通过呼吁生态定居点的Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）定居点，我们同意它们的根源在于60年代的嬉皮士运动。

让我们进一步看看。

这是另一篇互联网文章，引用了世界上最具影响力的10个生态定居点。排名第一的是Auroville²。我在第五本书“我们是谁？”中讨论了这种生态解决方案。在标题为“的章节中

生态解决方案的创始人Miira Alfassa（俗称“母亲”）被印度政府分配给该项目的土地和资金（尽管生态住区的成员没有获得土地或财产。）土地在1968年被分配，目的是积累多达5万名定居者，然而，在撰写本文时，定居点的人口大约是2000人。正如我们所看到的，尽管有许多广告和演讲，但生态解决方案从未成功发展过。关于这个地方的灵性。由于Auroville未能有效发展，因此未能吸引粉丝。相比之下，2001年有超过400个定居点接近37,000个家庭居民在俄罗斯成立。看到不同？然而，Auroville的领导人获得了免费的土地和土地（顺便提一下，其他几个所谓的生态住区）。更重要的是，Auroville的建立时间比俄罗斯定居点长得多。换句话说，世界的生态定居运动没有发展。如果我们开始致电俄罗斯和其他国家生态定居点创始人的Kin Domain定居点的创始人，我们可以想象得到这些定居点同样不稳定发展的报告，就像全球生态定居点所经历的那样。而且，正如你可能想象的那样，这一举措并非来自俄罗斯，而是来自西方。您可以在一篇名为“发起什么 - 一个Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）和解或生态解决方案”这篇非常好的文章中阅读更多关于这个主题的内容？“³。换句话说，世界的生态定居运动没有发展。如果我们开始致电俄罗斯和其他国家生态定居点创始人的Kin Domain定居点的创始人，我们可以想象得到这些定居点同样不稳定发展的报告，就像全球生态定居点所经历的那样。而且，正如你可能想象的那样，这一举措并非来自俄罗斯，而是来自西方。您可以在一篇名为“发起什么 - 一个Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）和解或生态解决方案”这篇非常好的文章中阅读更多关于这个主题的内容？“³。换句话说，世界的生态定居运动没有发展。如果我们开始致电俄罗斯和其他国家生态定居点创始人的Kin Domain定居点的创始人，我们可以想象得到这些定居点同样不稳定发展的报告，就像全球生态定居点所经历的那样。而且，正如你可能想象的那样，这一举措并非来自俄罗斯，而是来自西方。您可以在一篇名为“发起什么 - 一个Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）和解或生态解决方案”这篇非常好的文章中阅读更多关于这个主题的内容？“³。我们可以想象得到这些定居点同样不稳定发展的报告，就像全球生态定居点所经历的那样。而且，正如你可能想象的那样，这一举措并非来自俄罗斯，而是来自西方。您可以在一篇名为“发起什么 - 一个Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）和解或生态解决方案”这篇非常好的文章中阅读更多关于这个主题的内容？“³。我们可以想象得到这些定居点同样不稳定发展的报告，就像全球生态定居点所经历的那样。而且，正如你可能想象的那样，这一举措并非来自俄罗斯，而是来自西方。您可以在一篇名为“发起什么 - 一个Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）和解或生态解决方案”这篇非常好的文章中阅读更多关于这个主题的内容？“³。

“Ringing Cedars”系列书的许多读者都理解了被称为生态解决方案的现象与“Kin Domain（Family Homestead）和解”这一短语所描述的现象之间的区别。可悲的是，不是每个人都这样做 让我们想象一下这样一种情况：当没有阅读Megre书籍的人说“在俄罗斯已经建立了大约400个生态定居点”时会发生什么？那个人然后在互联网上搜索“生态解决”这个词，并找到前10名，Auroville排在第一位。如果她想了解更多有关生态定居运动的信息，她会转向哪里？究竟。她去了Auroville。因此，如果我们将我们的Kin Domain产品称为“生态解决方案”，我们将不得不开始模仿Auroville体验，因为它看起来像'

现在让我们回到Anastasia所描述的Kin Domain解决方案的框架。它的核心是“rodovoe”（“亲属”或“世袭”）本身，带有根：杆棒

（物种/种族/家族）。

Rodina（祖国/祖国）

Rodoslovnaya（祖先/家族树）

Rodnoe（家庭/本地人）。

正是这些内涵激发了人们启动Kin Domain定居点。它赋予了他们想象一个美好未来并将其付诸实践的力量。它描绘了一种能激励我们进入精神层面的能量。人依靠这种能量作为他存在的基本组成部分。任何人都可以自由地否认这一愿景。然而，如果他们这样做，能量将悄然离开他们的生活。当一个人发现自己没有精神核心时，她就会崩溃，除非她拒绝的未来愿景与另一个力量相等的愿望交换。但是，我们没有目睹Kin Domain定居点的这种垮台。也许我们更加意识到能够激励我们的能量，并继续在精神上提升我们的能量？

那么，如何回答“你是一个生态解决方案吗？”这个问题。让我们一起解决这个问题。我想你可以这样说：“我们专注，周到地照顾周围的自然，而且，我们努力改善环境。但是，我们不是生态解决方案，而是一个由家庭宅基地组成的解决方案“。

在官方的Kin Domain结算网站上，它没有提及有关生态住区的任何内容，但是，这个术语在整个互联网上用于描述我的Kin Domain结算。甚至还有一部有这个头衔的电影，感谢阿纳斯塔西娅和我的作品：“热烈感谢Anastasia和VladimirMegrе”。

最近，官方网站开始认识到俄罗斯定居运动的力量。例如，在俄罗斯联邦总统批准的关于远东发展的一个项目中，有一个关于'Kin Domain（家庭宅基地）定居点的部分⁴。

“人民阵线”发起了一场比赛。最好的ivision为俄罗斯的未来。人们在拍摄的一些片段中讨论了Kin Domain定居点。教师和定居点创始人在密歇根州立大学（莫斯科国立大学）举行了一次名为“国际科学和实践会议”的会议。发展“Kin Domain Settlements”的作用和条件。

我们必须理解并保护我们的愿景。

尊敬的
Vladimir Megre

查看Kin Domain Settlements列表 https://vmegre.com/en/kin-domain/